Eduard Habsburg, former Hungary’s ambassador to the Holy See: “If you follow the Traditional Latin Mass every day, you will notice that the reality of sacrifice, dying for the sins of others, giving your blood for the others — just the sacrifice is very strongly visible.”
05.10.2026
VATICAN COUNCIL II SUPPORTS THE TRADITIONALISTS: POPE LEO XIV MAINTAINS THE SECRET
Pope Leo does not tell the traditionalists that Vatican Council II interpreted rationally supports them and not the liberals and the left. He hides this information. But even the Cushingite traditionalists at the Catholic Identify Conference kept it a secret for another year.
It is now discovered that we can interpret Vatican Council II rationally or irrationally, with Feeneyism or Cushingism and the conclusion will be orthodox or schismatic.
When what is invisible is seen as just being invisible, I call it Feeneyism. When what is invisible is mistaken as being visible, I call it Cushingism.
Cushingism is irrationally, heretical and schismatic but not only is Pope Leo, the cardinals and bishops Cushingite but also the SSPX, the Ecclesia Dei communities, the 30 organizations which form the Summorum Pontificum, the Fatima Center, Una Voce and the Catholic Identity Conference.
Bishop Athanasius Schneider, Michael Matt and Edward Habsburg, deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Council of Florence 1442, which did not mention any exceptions. This is Cushingism.
For them the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed, the Nicene Creed, all the Catechisms have visible exceptions of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.
For the Feeneyites, those who interpret the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms with invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, there are no practical exceptions for the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed etc. Vatican Council II is traditional, dogmatic and ecclesiocentric and aligned with Tradition. There is continuity. There is unity with all the Catechisms for the Feeneyites on Vatican Council II.
The Cushingite ‘Catholics’ do not want to affirm the dogma EENS and suffer persecution from the political Left and the Vatican. So they change even the Nicene Creed.
One of the speakers at the Catholic Identity Conference 2026 was Sister Mary Anne micm. She is with the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center in Still River (not to be confused with the SBC in NH). They interpret Vatican Council II and the Creeds and Catechisms with Cushingism at the Latin Mass. They are Cushingite traditionalists, while the community in New Hampshire are Feeneyite traditionalists. Sr.Mary Anne is a Cushingite like the SSPX .The community is granted full canonical recognition since they initially accepted Vatican council II. They also interpret the Council as a break and not continuity with Tradition (EENS etc).
Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger did not tell Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre before his excommunication that Vatican Council II was really Feeneyite and so supported the traditionalists and not the Rahner, Lubac, Congar, Murray, Kung and the others.
Today Pope Leo did not tell Bishop Fellay that Vatican Council II is aligned with the traditionalists. Pope Paul VI did not tell this to Bishop Fellay, when the bishop was excommunicated the first time, along with Archbishop Lefebvre.
Cardinal Ratzinger also did not call for the lifting of the excommunication of Fr.Leonard Feeney in 1965-1971. Vatican Council II was aligned with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Feeneyite Vatican Council II supported the dogma EENS as held by Fr. Leonard Feeney. Cushingite Vatican Council II had alleged practical exceptions for the dogma EENS of the Council of Florence.
Today a Decree of Prohibitions is being maintained against the St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire when Vatican Council II interpreted rationally supports them on extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite and not Cushingite).
Pope Leo and Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester in New Hampshire, affirm Vatican Council II Cushingite, as does Cardinal Sean O Malley the Archbishop of Boston.
It was with Vatican Council II Cushingite, that Cardinal Fernandez declared Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano to be in schism.
This issue was not brought up at the Catholic Identity Conference since Michael Matt wants to be political correct with the Left. So he remains a Cushingite and not a Feeneyite on Tradition.
The Summorum Pontificum organizations, Una Voce, the Latin Mass groups in England, the Catholic Identity Conference, and Fatima Center….none of them are supporting the traditionalists at the St. Benedict Center in NH, to avoid persecution. They have changed the version of even the Creeds, and still call themselves traditionalists. They are not politically correct with the progressivists and their Latin Mass is Cushingite.
Not even Cardinal Raymond Burke a Cushingite is appealing to Pope Leo XIV to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and announce that the Council and Catechisms support the traditionalists and not the liberals. The Council has the hermeneutic of continuity with the dogma EENS of the Council of Florence 1442,
The Austro-Hungarian Catholic Empire was Feeneyite but Edward Habsburg today is Cushingite like the liberals at the Novus Ordo Mass.-Lionel Andrades
05.10.2026
Italian Ministry of Interior forces Catholic to deny the Faith
@Lionel Leslie Andrades
Is that a statue of himself? Seems a little odd to place statue of whomever at a Catholic Identity Conference. I would expect a statue of Our Lord, or the BVM.
V tradičnej latinskej omši je obetný charakter „veľmi výrazne viditeľný“, povedal Eduard Habsburg 3. októbra na konferencii Catholic Identity Conference v Pittsburghu. Strávil 54 rokov v Novus Ordo, než objavil latinskú omšu, ktorá „vám poskytuje priestor na to, aby ste sa ponorili do modlitby, kontemplácie a meditácie“.
Tiež porovnal tieto dve formy omše: V latinskej omši „je obeta veľmi výrazne viditeľná“. Avšak „v dnešnej omši je prítomná, ale nie je tak v popredí ako v latinskej omši“.
Na missa tradicional em latim, o caráter sacrificial é «muito visível», afirmou Eduard Habsburg na Conferência sobre Identidade Católica, realizada em Pittsburgh a 3 de outubro. Passou 54 anos no Novus Ordo antes de descobrir a missa em latim, que «proporciona espaço para mergulhar na oração, para contemplar e para meditar».
Ele também comparou as duas formas da missa: na missa em latim, «o sacrifício é muito visível». Mas «na missa de hoje, está presente, mas não tão em destaque como na missa em latim».
Podczas tradycyjnej mszy łacińskiej charakter ofiarny jest „bardzo wyraźnie widoczny” – powiedział Eduard Habsburg podczas konferencji poświęconej tożsamości katolickiej, która odbyła się 3 października w Pittsburghu. Przez 54 lata uczestniczył w liturgii Novus Ordo, zanim odkrył mszę łacińską, która „daje przestrzeń na zanurzenie się w modlitwie, kontemplację i medytację”.
Porównał również te dwie formy Mszy św.: w Mszy łacińskiej „ofiara jest bardzo wyraźnie widoczna”. Natomiast „w dzisiejszej Mszy św. jest ona obecna, ale nie zajmuje tak znaczącego miejsca jak w Mszy łacińskiej”.
przede wszystkim daje pewność, że
czynimy to co Kościół Katolicki otrzymał w Objawieniu,
a nie jakieś tam przestrzenie, czy inne wydumki . . .
Różnica między Mszą tradycyjną a posoborową polega na intencji. Msza tradycyjna to bezkrwawa ofiara Chrystusa za grzechy świata, bo taki był cel tejże ofiary. Posoborowa, to uczta eucharystyczna i wzajemne kontakty zgromadzonych, na zasadzie ,,przekażcie sobie znak pokoju,,. Tę ,,ucztę,, egzekwuje się dokładnie poprzez udzielanie Komunii Świętej ,,z kolejki,, na stojąco, a od jakiegoś czasu i na rękę, co zdecydowanie umniejsza sacrum Komunii.
Nella Messa tradizionale in latino, il carattere sacrificale è «molto chiaramente visibile», ha affermato Eduard Habsburg in occasione della Conferenza sull’Identità Cattolica tenutasi a Pittsburgh il 3 ottobre. Egli ha trascorso 54 anni nel Novus Ordo prima di scoprire la Messa in latino, che «offre lo spazio per immergersi nella preghiera, nella contemplazione e nella meditazione».
Ha inoltre messo a confronto le due forme di Messa: nella Messa in latino, «il sacrificio è molto chiaramente visibile». Ma «nella Messa odierna è presente, pur non essendo così in primo piano come nella Messa in latino».
Il futuro imperatore ha scritto un libro!
Un bell'articolo del 2024 di Paolo Gulisano (medico e scrittore), pubblicato da Blondet
A hagyományos latin misében az áldozati jelleg „rendkívül erőteljesen megnyilvánul” – mondta Eduard Habsburg október 3-án a pittsburghi Katolikus Identitás Konferencián. 54 évet töltött a Novus Ordo keretein belül, mielőtt felfedezte a latin misét, amely „teret ad az imádkozásba való elmélyülésre, a szemlélődésre és a meditációra”.
Emellett összehasonlította a mise két formáját: a latin misében „az áldozat nagyon erőteljesen látható”. A mai misében viszont „jelen van, de nem annyira előtérben, mint a latin misében”.
In der traditionellen lateinischen Messe sei der Opfercharakter „sehr deutlich sichtbar“, erklärte Eduard Habsburg am 3. Oktober auf der „Catholic Identity Conference“ in Pittsburgh. Er verbrachte 54 Jahre im Novus Ordo, bevor er die lateinische Messe entdeckte, die „Ihnen Raum gibt, in das Gebet einzutauchen, zu kontemplieren und zu meditieren“.
Er stellte zudem die beiden Formen der Messe gegenüber: In der lateinischen Messe sei „das Opfer sehr deutlich sichtbar“. In der heutigen Messe sei es zwar ebenfalls vorhanden, stehe jedoch „nicht so sehr im Vordergrund wie in der lateinischen Messe“.
Die Einhaltung des depositum fidei findet nur im traditionellen, lateinischen Hl Messopfer vollkommene Entsprechung. Die TLM ist keine Option, sondern der Wille Christi.
Die einzig wahre röm. Hl Messe ist jene des lateinischen Ritus gemäss Pius V. Es darf jedoch das Messbuch von 1962 verwendet werden, welches alle wichtigen Punkte eines gültigen Messopfers beinhaltet. Finger weg jedoch vom FM veränderten Roncalli 1965.
En la misa tradicional en latín, el carácter sacrificial es «muy evidente», afirmó Eduard Habsburg en la Conferencia sobre la Identidad Católica celebrada en Pittsburgh el 3 de octubre. Pasó 54 años en el Novus Ordo antes de descubrir la misa en latín, que «le brinda espacio para sumergirse en la oración, la contemplación y la meditación».
Asimismo, contrastó las dos formas de la misa: en la misa en latín, «el sacrificio es muy evidente». Sin embargo, «en la misa actual está presente, pero no ocupa un primer plano como en la misa en latín».
La santa misa tradicional en latín es la única que coinicide por completo con el depositun fidei. La santa misa traditoinal no es una "opción", sino la Santa Voluntad de Jesucristo.
Lors de la messe traditionnelle en latin, le caractère sacrificiel est « très clairement perceptible », a déclaré Eduard Habsburg lors de la Conférence sur l’identité catholique qui s’est tenue à Pittsburgh le 3 octobre. Il a passé 54 ans dans le Novus Ordo avant de découvrir la messe en latin, qui « vous offre un espace pour vous plonger dans la prière, la contemplation et la méditation ».
Il a également mis en parallèle les deux formes de la messe : dans la messe en latin, « le sacrifice est très clairement visible ». En revanche, « dans la messe d’aujourd’hui, il est présent, mais pas aussi mis en avant que dans la messe en latin ».
In the traditional Latin Mass, the sacrificial character is “very strongly visible,” Eduard Habsburg said at the Catholic Identity Conference in Pittsburgh on October 3. He spent 54 years in the Novus Ordo before discovering the Latin Mass, which “gives you space to sink into prayer and to contemplate and to meditate.”
He also contrasted the two forms of the Mass: In the Latin Mass, “the sacrifice is very strongly visible.” But “in today’s Mass it is present but not as much in the forefront as in the Latin Mass.”
Unfortunately, the credibility of this conference was undercut by the way it attempted to delete one of its featured speakers simply for criticizing the Novus Ordo.
The message this sends is troubling: you can have your traditional Catholic practices and traditions, so long as you ignore—or at least tolerate—the coexistence of an ever-evolving rite that, in important respects, contradicts what those traditions affirm.
At that point, Catholics are effectively being asked to treat their rite as nothing more than a hat they put on occasionally, rather than as an integral expression of their Catholic faith and identity.