Dr. Mazza to Msgr. Schneider: "I cannot think of any statement in 2,000 years of Catholic history that …

Dr. Mazza to Msgr. Schneider: "I cannot think of any statement in 2,000 years of Catholic history that is more contrary to Catholicism than saying that a Pope can teach a grave error and be a Flaming heretic, but there is nothing we can do—we just have to live with it."

What Church History REVEALS About Leo’s …

This is called betrayal, not faithfulness to Christ.

We have been taught that the dogma of Papal Infallibility assures us that the Pope—or rather, the Papal Magisterium—is infallible and cannot err in matters of faith and morals when teaching the whole Church. Yet, both Bergoglio and Prevost have challenged Catholic morality with *Fiducia Supplicans* and *Amoris Laetitia*, and have challenged the Catholic faith by promoting the idea that Christ is not necessary for salvation and that adherents of false religions—such as Islam—and all Jews who reject their Messiah can be saved.
Against Faith and Against the First Commandment: Abu Dhabi, Laudato Si, Fratelli Tutti, etc.
Neither the ordinary nor the extraordinary magisterium of a pope can be heretical.

Neither the ordinary nor the extraordinary magisterium of a pope can be heretical. For otherwise, it would mean that the individual is not the pope, but merely a heretic and apostate rebelling against God and the Church.

This not only violates the First Commandment but constitutes blasphemy against the Most Holy Trinity; nevertheless, the obstinate Catholics who defend these two flagrant apostates continue to call them popes and demand obedience to two impostors who disobey and defy God. Even those who recognize these heretics—who had already rebelled against God and separated themselves from the Mystical Body of the Church through their apostate, heretical, blasphemous, sacrilegious, and schismatic acts prior to their invalid elections—are without excuse; for we have the example of the apostate angels who, despite holding legitimate authority, rebelled against God, while an angel of lower rank—Saint Michael—was the only one with the courage to rally an army to defend the rights of Christ against an apostate hierarchy.

Prevost violating the First Commandment before and after his invalid election.

In Peru, Brazil, Colombia, and elsewhere, Robert Prevost engages in the worship of Pachamama—now also under the guise of inculturation and hiding behind the pretext of religious freedom.

Prevost mocks Sainthood

That is why the evil Prevost—mocking the sanctifying Holy Spirit—approved the promotion to sainthood within his new sect of the depraved, apostate Marxist bishop Alejandro Labaka, who allowed Indigenous children to touch his genitals and who, rather than evangelizing them, engaged in "inculturation."

If we consult the still-existing Vatican webpage for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith from the time of Pope John Paul II, we can still read that canonizations fall under the Pope's infallible Magisterium—which demonstrates that Prevost is not the Pope.

Against Catholic morality, against the natural law given by God. Amoris Laetitia.
Prior to an invalid election, Prevost had already embraced Bergoglio's apostasy and supported *Amoris Laetitia* and *Fiducia Supplicans*.

Prevost supports sinful same-sex civil unions and gay adoption

After warning us that many would come in His name and deceive many—and that these false prophets, speaking lies in God's name, would cause many to be lost—Christ, as a good teacher, gave us a single lesson that even a Catholic child can understand: by their bad fruits, we would recognize the shepherds from whom we must flee, rather than join. For this reason, the Church's Magisterium has always *ipso facto* excommunicated the accomplices of heretics; joining a heretic means joining those who rebel against God, just as the apostate angels did when they joined Lucifer. Therefore, those who delude themselves by continuing to recognize Bergoglio and Prevost as popes have become their accomplices. Even if they are merely passive accomplices in this rebellion against God, by legitimizing these men, they have contributed to the perdition of many souls—souls being dragged into committing the sin of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit by being confirmed not in the faith, but in sin and rebellion against God. For he who has fallen into the vice of sodomy—if, instead of repenting, he remains obstinate and even identifies as a sodomite (gay)—has not only driven the Holy Spirit from his body but has turned it into a dwelling place for the devil and trampled upon the blood of Christ, thereby rejecting Christ as his Redeemer. One who loves his sin cannot be redeemed, for he loathes the law of God.
Likewise, those who reject Christ and prefer to worship their false gods or await another messiah—an antichrist, a false messiah who will not redeem them...